
When Ross Mounce tried, his research Measure-ments used a fossilized feathered theropod dinosaur, he struck a large bone of contention. Error, the Mounce contained the dinosaurs a formatting describes a data table in the newspaper, relationship to other dinosaurs, and the paper prevents the creature senior author ignored repeated email requests for the original file.
Mounce, who is studying for a doctorate in evolution at the University of bath, UK, have finally taken the file according to the magazine editor. Now Mounce leads a campaign to prevent such situations, by you the common practice for paleontologists to load the raw data behind their papers in online repositories - usual, in other disciplines but rarely in Paleontology. The call has drawn a mix of support and dismay, but a fundamental change may already be in progress: several paleontology journals have unroll recently digital archiving policies that align with Mounce's goal.
Paleontologists demanded better digital data storage and data sharing to say, that the move will bother, information about fossils find scientists not only spare parts, but also underpin future studies with the data in ways that are not possible today. "I think that easily the largest is plus," says Peter Wagner, curator of the Palaeo-zoic molluscs on the US National Museum of natural history (NMNH) in Washington DC, which supports the campaign.
Public repositories aid already in other areas of data sharing. Gene bank, a database of the US National Center for biotechnology information in Bethesda, Maryland, led free provides more than 100 million genetic sequences, and most journals require that scientists in their pages to publish their data.
Similar databases are available for Palaeo-ntologists. MorphoBank, logged, for example, detailed fossil pictures, including three-dimensional computed tomography of scans. Another repository, TreeBASE, collects the phylogenetic trees that show evolutionary relationships between species. But magazines don't force researchers to add their data to these systems, and Mounce - thinks an open letter - with almost 150 signatories, that they should.
Some scientists fear that important data such as detailed geographical information on fossil discoveries would disclosure of the illegal trade with fossil feed. "The Burgess shale is a typical example." "It is a well known and it is to the death, looted", says Jonathan Antcliffe, a Palaeo-biologist at the University of Bristol, UK, referring to a rich treasure trove of Cambrian fossils in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Some countries, including the United States, making illegal fossil sites on public lands publicly known to exist.
Antcliffe is concerned, that mandatory data archiving from scientists of the publication of progress reports to long-term projects, fear that it could discourage the raw data to the blades to rivals. He adds that students who more time as an experienced Palaeontologist, could make research papers, would be particularly vulnerable.
Tensions between scientists discover new fossils you and those who analyse and synthesize aren't their findings, paleontologist at the University of Bristol says Mike Benton, a vertebrate. For example, Jack Sepkoski of the University of Chicago, Illinois, studying mass extinctions in the 1970s and 1980s in global fossils, criticism for the transfer of other scientists faced field work. But Benton, says "If you wanted to keep it secret, you should not have published it".
ADVERTISING
The field in this direction seems to be whether paleontologists are, for binding digital archiving or not ready. Data exchange announced edicts of agencies such as the US National Science Foundation, driven partly by journal of vertebrate paleontology financing in January indicates that it would require authors to raw data files on your site (A. Berta and p. M. Barrett j. vert.) Paleontol. 31, 1; (2011) It is considering commissioning of storage in public repositories such as such as Morphobank. Meanwhile, the Paleontological Society in Boulder, Colorado, the Paleobiology and journal of paleontology, decided last month published for the archiving of data from his papers with a repository Dryad called. "My only concern is that archiving is an unfunded mandate," says Philip Gingerich, President of the society. "Archiving could consume easily an entire research budget."
Brian Huber, curator of planktic Foramini-fera to the NMNH and coeditor of the journal of paleontology, says that he was wary of the cost for digital archiving but to come up with the idea. "This is the way of the future, and the company decided, we have to lead on this instead of being too conservative."
If you something offensive or inappropriate or that otherwise are not met our conditions or Community guidelines, select you the appropriate "this comment report" Link.Kommentare on this thread are marked according to the time of booking.There are currently no comments.
This is a public forum. Please keep to our community guidelines. You can be controversial, but please you understand personal or offensive and keep it short. Keep in mind that our threads are for feedback and discussion - not for testing publishing, press releases and advertising.
You must be registered with the nature to leave a comment. Please log in or register as a new user. Be redirected back to this page.
没有评论:
发表评论